Difference between revisions of "Watir and Selenium"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Selenium & Watir Discussion) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Watir | * Watir | ||
− | + | ** Watir is IE only | |
− | + | *** although there is a FireWatir project, it is out of sync and not able to easily share tests from Watir itself | |
− | + | ** Watir scripts are written in Ruby | |
− | + | *** for Java, Watij | |
− | + | *** for .NET (C#), Watin | |
+ | |||
* Selenium (OpenQa.org) | * Selenium (OpenQa.org) | ||
− | + | ** Scripts are JavaScript-based | |
− | + | ** Scripts can be subject to hanging (especially with popups) although "click and wait" has been a sufficient workaround for some. | |
− | + | ** Selenium does have a script recorder. | |
− | + | *** And of course my favorite quote: "Having a good recorder decreases the success rate of your tool." -Bret | |
− | + | ** The Selenium IDE can generate scripts in multiple formats: XML, JavaScript, etc.. |
Latest revision as of 15:01, 14 April 2008
- Watir
- Watir is IE only
- although there is a FireWatir project, it is out of sync and not able to easily share tests from Watir itself
- Watir scripts are written in Ruby
- for Java, Watij
- for .NET (C#), Watin
- Watir is IE only
- Selenium (OpenQa.org)
- Scripts are JavaScript-based
- Scripts can be subject to hanging (especially with popups) although "click and wait" has been a sufficient workaround for some.
- Selenium does have a script recorder.
- And of course my favorite quote: "Having a good recorder decreases the success rate of your tool." -Bret
- The Selenium IDE can generate scripts in multiple formats: XML, JavaScript, etc..